🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.